The democratic peace theory
The
democratic peace theory is a relatively new development.
One explanation is that democratic governments were
scarce before the late 19th century. Although the philosophical
idea has circulated since Immanuel Kant, it was not
scientifically evaluated until the 1960s.
Immanuel KantKant foreshadowed the theory in his essay
Perpetual Peace written in 1795, although he thought
that constitutional republics was only one of several
necessary conditions for a perpetual peace. Kant's theory
was that a majority of the people would never vote to
go to war, unless in self defense. Therefore, if all
nations were republics, it would end war, because there
would be no aggressors. Other explanations have been
proposed since, but the modern theory is principally
the empirical claim that democracies rarely or never
fight (Ray 1998).
Dean
Babst, a criminologist, was the first to do statistical
research on this topic. He wrote an academic paper supporting
the theory in 1964 in Wisconsin Sociologist; he published
a slightly more popularized version, in 1972, in the
trade journal Industrial Research. Both versions initially
received little attention.
Melvin
Small and J. David Singer (1976) responded; they found
an absence of wars between democratic states with two
"marginal exceptions", but denied that this
pattern had statistical significance, starting the academic
debate. This paper was published in a political science
journal which finally brought more widespread attention
to the theory, as did Michael Doyle's (1983) lengthy
discussion of the topic. Rudolph J. Rummel was another
early researcher and drew considerable lay attention
to the subject in his later works.
Maoz
& Abdolali (1989) extended the research to lesser
conflicts than wars. Bremer (1992) and Maoz & Russett
(1992) found the correlation between democracy and peacefulness
remained significant after controlling for many possible
confounding variables. This moved the theory into the
mainstream of social science. Supporters of Realism
in international relations and others responded by raising
many new objections. Other researchers attempted more
systematic explanations of how democracy might cause
peace (Kochler 1995), and of how democracy might also
affect other aspects of foreign relations such as alliances
and collaboration (Ray 2003).
There
have been numerous further studies in the field since
these pioneering works.[2] Most studies have found some
form of democratic peace exists, although neither methodological
disputes nor doubtful cases are entirely resolved (Kinsella
2005).